My Blog About The

Mischief Going On In

   Taylor Alabama

A Neighbor Dispute in Taylor, Alabama: Our Experience and Why We Did Not Move In

This page documents our experience and the circumstances that led us to abandon our planned move to Taylor, Alabama. 

 

Important Update:

It has since been confirmed that the neighbor referenced in this post was serving as a Taylor, Alabama Police Auxiliary Officer at the time of the conduct described. After reviewing the video evidence, the Taylor Police Department terminated his affiliation with the department. This information is provided to give readers a full and accurate understanding of the circumstances surrounding these events.

This video shows the neighbor vandalizing our home. 

This video shows the neighbor removing our survey stakes that we had installed to put up a privacy fence.  

This video lets you hear the foul music the neighbor plays to torment us.  

Disclaimer

This page reflects my personal experiences, recollections, and opinions based on events as I observed or understood them at the time. It is not intended as a statement of proven fact regarding any individual’s intent, character, or legality of conduct.

Some statements are based on my recollection of conversations or public proceedings and may not reflect exact wording or complete context. I am not an attorney, and any discussion of legal issues reflects my personal understanding, not legal conclusions.

Others may have different perspectives, and I encourage readers to seek additional viewpoints and primary sources.

 

Background

We purchased our home in Taylor, Alabama, in July 2024. The house needed cosmetic updates such as flooring and paint but was livable as-is. As empty nesters, my wife and I planned to downsize and move closer to Dothan. We had both owned homes in Taylor nearly two decades ago and had positive experiences living in the area, so we believed this would be our long-term retirement home.

Those plans changed after issues arose with a neighboring property.

 

Property Line Dispute

After purchasing the home, we asked the neighboring property owner to move a shed and a vehicle that were located on our side of the property line. Instead of resolving the issue, additional items were placed along the boundary, some extending several feet onto our property.

I attended two city council meetings seeking guidance, but no resolution came from those efforts. During one meeting, the mayor made a remark asking whether I owned a chainsaw in response to my concern about property encroachment. I did not understand the relevance of that comment, and the situation continued to escalate.

 

Security Concerns and Installation of Cameras

Over time, we noticed that items inside our garage and yard appeared to be moved when we were not present. Nothing was taken, but the repeated disturbances caused concern. As a result, we upgraded our locks and installed a security system with eight cameras connected to a DVR.

 

May 2025 Incident – Video Evidence

In May 2025, the security system recorded the neighbor on our property at night. After the alarm activated, the video shows the individual removing a camera from the house and damaging the soffit to access the alarm siren. The siren was removed and did not remain on the property.

The footage shows the individual positioned with his back toward the house while the alarm was sounding. The video posted online is a recording of the DVR screen; the original footage is clearer.

 

Police Investigation

After the incident, law enforcement responded. I was later told that the neighbor’s wife stated he believed he heard music coming from our house and went to investigate, and that the alarm components fell during that process. After providing the full video footage to police, it was clear that this explanation did not align with what was recorded.

This incident explained why we had installed the cameras in the first place.

 

Ongoing Court Delays

Since the May 2025 incident, the case has appeared on the Taylor Municipal Court docket multiple times without proceeding to trial. I personally appeared or prepared to appear on five occasions.

The defendant’s attorney requested continuances that were granted. I was officially notified of only one court date; for the others, I contacted the magistrate’s office monthly to inquire about scheduling. On more than one occasion, I was provided incorrect dates for the hearings.

On one occasion, the trial was moments from starting when the defendant’s attorney stated he needed to be in another court. The defendant has appeared only once. I do not know how notice was provided to the defendant for each setting.

 

Notification Issue

The only time I was properly notified of a court date without having to ask was after I contacted Mayor Lamb. He was unaware of the scheduled date, despite being listed as a witness, and contacted the police department, who then notified me. That was the only instance of consistent notice. (Update: I was notified of an upcoming court date in February while visiting the Magistrate's office checking on the case.) We will be at nine months for a case that the Magistrate described as "like a parking ticket." 

 

Representation Concerns

I later learned that the law firm representing the defendant also represents the City of Taylor. Based on my personal reading of the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, Rules 1.7 and 1.10, this raised concerns for me about a potential conflict of interest.

I am not an attorney and do not know whether the firm’s representation violates those rules. However, the overlap caused me concern given the involvement of city officials, police, and court personnel in this matter.

 

Charges

At various times, I was told different things regarding the charges. I was initially informed that charges such as theft and criminal trespass were involved. Later, I was told the matter had been reduced to something comparable to a minor offense, "like a parking ticket", and that damages would be depreciated because the property was used.

After filing a subpoena on my own through Circuit Court to obtain clarity, the only confirmed charge I received documentation for was Criminal Mischief in the Third Degree.

 

Police Department Interaction

Despite the broader situation, the investigating officers and Chief Brazier treated me respectfully. Once the full video was reviewed, it was clear that earlier explanations did not align with the evidence.

I installed the security system because unexplained activity had occurred on the property. An officer later asked whether I had noticed any unusual odors coming from the neighboring property. I am not accusing anyone of illegal activity; I mention this only to explain the context of why seeing someone on my property at night, looking toward the roofline, felt invasive and concerning.

 

Ongoing Nuisance Issues

The neighboring property has been used for automotive repair activity in the backyard. This is based on my observations. This involved noise and vehicle accumulation for extended periods. I reported these issues multiple times.

At one point, enforcement efforts led to cleanup and reduced activity. After changes in department leadership, vehicles and debris returned along our property line. We ultimately installed a privacy fence.

 

Survey Stakes Incident

In July 2025, after a professional survey was conducted for the fence installation, survey stakes were installed. The neighbor removed the survey stakes. The removal was captured on video. I was told by city officials that property line disputes are civil matters.

 

That's Not All

There is far more to this situation than can reasonably be covered in a single post. Over an extended period, my neighbor repeatedly allowed his dogs to enter our yard and threaten us. On one occasion, I was bitten. On another, my wife was chased by their pit bull. I was later attacked by the same dog.

At the time, I believe the neighbor had approximately six dogs. Because the dogs were kept inside the home, I cannot state the exact number with certainty.

After multiple complaints, the Police Chief advised me that if the dogs were on my property and posed a threat, I could shoot them. He also informed my neighbor that he had given me that instruction.

After months of enduring these conditions, the incidents finally stopped.

 

Current Status

Additional information may be added as events progress. Some details are intentionally being withheld at this time.